Su-57 vs F-35: Which Fighter Jet Meets India’s Air Defence Needs?

The United States, Russia, and China are the only nations operating fifth-generation stealth fighter jets today. India has plans to develop its Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA). The first prototype will not be ready until the mid-2030s. Chinese forces will likely have deployed about 1,000 J-20 Mighty Dragons by then, creating a substantial air power imbalance across the region.

India’s air defence strategy faces a vital decision between Russia’s Su-57 and America’s F-35. The Su-57 delivers remarkable capabilities with Mach 2 speed and compatibility with hypersonic missiles. The F-35 stands out with proven reliability from over 1,000 units operating worldwide and enhanced stealth features. This piece examines both fighters’ capabilities, their potential fit with the Indian Air Force, and their strategic advantages to determine which aircraft aligns better with India’s defence requirements.

Table of Contents

Toggle

Technical Specifications Face-Off

The Su-57 and F-35 fighter jets showcase different design philosophies and capabilities through their technical specifications. The Su-57’s twin-engine design stretches 65 feet 11 inches with a 46-foot 3-inch wingspan. The F-35 comes in a more compact single-engine package at 51 feet 4 inches long with a 35-foot wingspan.

Speed and Maneuverability Comparison

The Su-57 reaches an impressive top speed of Mach 2 (2,450 km/h). The F-35’s maximum velocity hits Mach 1.6, which makes it slower than its Russian counterpart. Thrust vectoring technology gives the Su-57 remarkable maneuverability that allows complex aerial maneuvers. Both aircraft can supercruise, though the Su-57 maintains Mach 1.3 without using afterburners.

Combat Range and Payload Capacity

The Su-57’s combat range extends to 3,107 miles, which substantially exceeds the F-35’s 1,379-mile reach. The Russian fighter’s maximum takeoff weight reaches 77,162 pounds, while the F-35 tops out at 65,918 pounds. The Su-57’s design includes two main weapon bays between its engine nacelles that work together with smaller side bays near the wing root.

Engine Performance Analysis

Here’s how the engines compare:

The Su-57 uses dual NPO Saturn AL-41F1 engines that generate substantial thrust across different operating modes. The F-35’s single Pratt & Whitney F135 engine offers better fuel efficiency despite its newer design. Western analysts point out that both the F-22 and F-35 feature more advanced engine technology than the Su-57, which still relies on engines from the Su-35S platform.

Stealth and Combat Capabilities

Stealth capabilities are the life-blood of fifth-generation fighter aircraft design. The F-35 and Su-57 show distinctly different approaches to radar evasion and electronic warfare.

Radar Cross Section Measurements

The F-35 shows superior stealth characteristics with a radar cross-section (RCS) better than -40 dBsm. This makes the F-35 as stealthy as a small bird or bumblebee in practical terms. The Su-57 achieves an RCS between 0.1 to 1 square meters, which makes it detectable at substantially greater distances.

These numbers translate directly to detection ranges against an S-400’s 91N6E Search radar:

• The Su-57 becomes detectable at 155 kilometers
• The F-35 remains hidden until approximately 27 kilometers

The Su-57’s higher RCS comes from specific design elements. The absence of S-ducts and exposed rivets and screws increase radar reflectivity. The engines lack adequate protection from radar waves, which gives the aircraft a frontal RCS comparable to a refrigerator.

Electronic Warfare Systems

The F-35 excels in electronic warfare through its sophisticated sensor fusion capabilities. It creates an integrated battlefield image using its 360-degree Distributed Aperture System. The aircraft’s central computer system controls all operations and enables precise targeting with improved situational awareness.

The Su-57 responds with its L402 Himalayas jamming system and N036 Belka AESA radar. Its electronic warfare suite has:

The F-35’s advanced computing architecture allows quick integration of new technologies without major infrastructure changes. This provides superior long-term adaptability for emerging threats. The Su-57, despite its advanced features, has limitations in bandwidth and datalink capabilities that affect its overall electronic warfare effectiveness.

Integration with Indian Air Force

The Indian Air Force currently has 31 fighter squadrons instead of its authorized 42. This gap creates real challenges when choosing between F-35 or Su-57 fighters for India’s mixed air fleet.

Compatibility with Existing Aircraft

The F-35 comes with major integration hurdles because of its NATO-based systems. The IAF uses a combination of Russian, French, and locally-made aircraft that don’t work with NATO systems. This mismatch limits how well the F-35 can share data during operations. The Su-57 makes more sense for integration since India already flies over 250 Su-30MKIs. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited’s experience in building Russian fighters under license would help with maintenance and operations.

Training Requirements and Timeline

Both platforms need different training approaches. F-35 pilots must learn NATO-standard operations and complex data systems from scratch. The Su-57’s controls and systems feel familiar to pilots who fly Russian aircraft in the IAF fleet. This similarity would speed up training. Ground crews would also take less time to adapt to the Russian fighter.

Maintenance Infrastructure Needs

Each aircraft brings its own maintenance challenges:

The Su-57 program lets India manufacture parts locally and gain more technology access. HAL’s long history with Russian platforms provides solid maintenance foundations. The F-35 needs new infrastructure investments and special maintenance protocols that match American standards.

Strategic Partnership Benefits

Russia’s proposal for the Su-57 goes way beyond just selling aircraft. The United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) has suggested several ways to work together that match India’s defence modernization goals.

Technology Transfer Opportunities

Russia will transfer the complete package of technological solutions for the Su-57. We developed a two-seat variant specifically for Indian needs. Russia provides extensive training programs, which became clear when Indian engineers completed 20 specialized training courses under the previous preliminary design contract.

The technology transfer package has:

• Rights to manufacture key components locally
• Development of Indian-specific variants
• Integration of indigenous weapons systems
• Access to critical aviation technologies

Local Manufacturing Potential

The manufacturing partnership brings significant economic benefits through several approaches. Rosoboronexport has outlined a detailed plan that has:

This partnership model matches India’s “Make in India” initiative, unlike traditional procurement. India’s domestic defence industry could grow stronger through knowledge transfer and skill development. The partnership gives India a chance to improve its indigenous defence capabilities while keeping control over fighter jet production.

India can produce the two-seat Su-57 platform directly on its soil. This approach supports India’s larger goals of becoming self-reliant in defence manufacturing. The technology transfer would help India eventually produce this class of fighters on its own.

Cost and Long-term Value

Money matters a lot when countries buy fighter jets. The Su-57 and F-35 show big differences in their buying price and what it costs to keep them flying.

Purchase and Maintenance Costs

You can get a Su-57 for INR 2953.32–5484.73 million, which costs less than an F-35A at INR 6750.44 million per unit. The F-35’s special pilot helmet costs INR 33.75 million and needs maintenance checks twice a year.

Here’s what these jets cost broken down:

These aircraft need very different maintenance setups. We used the Flanker series maintenance costs as a baseline for the Su-57. This makes it cheaper for air forces that already fly Russian planes. The F-35 needs its own special maintenance facilities and training programs, which adds to its total ownership costs.

Upgrade Pathways

The F-35 will keep flying until 2070, with clear plans for future upgrades. The US military wants to buy more than 2,400 F-35 fighters by 2044. This means the platform will keep getting better over time.

The Su-57’s upgrade plans focus on:

• New Saturn 30 engines that need less maintenance
• Better radar-absorbent materials that are easier to maintain
• Working with partners to develop unmanned aviation

The money side goes beyond just buying the planes. The Su-57 program lets buyers pay in Indian rupees. The program ended up delivering fewer than 40 aircraft since its first flight in 2010. This raises questions about getting support and upgrades in the future.

Comparison Table

Conclusion

Su-57 and F-35 each bring unique advantages that match India’s air defence needs. Su-57 shows better speed, range, and payload capacity. It reaches Mach 2 and flies up to 3,107 miles in combat. F-35 stands out with its stealth features. S-400 systems can detect Su-57 from 155 kilometers away, while F-35 remains hidden until 27 kilometers.

Russian fighter Su-57 fits India’s needs better. It works smoothly with IAF’s current setup, and India’s pilots already know how to handle Su-30MKI operations. Su-57’s detailed technology transfer deal lets India make parts locally. The jet costs between INR 2953.32–5484.73 million, which beats F-35’s price of INR 6750.44 million.

F-35 has proven its worth with over 1,000 jets flying worldwide. Yet Su-57 makes more sense because it matches India’s current aircraft fleet and maintenance setup. Russia’s offer helps India upgrade its defence and build more weapons at home.

Looking at the specs, how well it fits in, and what India gets from the deal, Su-57 makes the most sense for India’s air defence. This choice helps India match its regional rivals and builds up India’s defence industry through shared production and new technology.

FAQs